GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 765M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 765M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 139% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 1800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14-GE | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |