GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 765M has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
140−150
medium / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
55−60
QHD / 1440p
40−45
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
75−80
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
35−40
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14-GE
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
30 May 2013
21 March 2018
Pipelines
768
512
Core clock speed
850 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
55.23
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,326 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
