GeForce GTX 765M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1132 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14-GE | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |