GeForce GTX 765M vs Tesla M60
When choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 293 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 247% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 202% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 312% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 276% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14-GE | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |