GeForce GTX 770 vs NVS 810

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 770 and NVS 810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 770 stacks up against NVS 810, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 770 Check Price

NVS 810 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 770	NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	One 8-pin and one 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	8x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 770 has 238% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 770 and NVS 810 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 770 is build with Kepler architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 770 is 144 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
GeForce GTX 770 and NVS 810 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 188 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 770.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 770 is 5212 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	1−2
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	12−14
medium / 1080p	40−45	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	16−18
medium / 1080p	60−65	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 770 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	120−130
medium / 768p	220−230	95−100
ultra / 1080p	180−190	40−45
QHD / 1440p	110−120	21−24
4K / 2160p	70−75	16−18
high / 768p	210−220	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	60−65	65−70
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	100−110	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	40−45	2−3
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	2−3
low / 720p	80−85	10−12
medium / 1080p	45−50	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	60−65	10−11
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	27−30	4−5
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	50−55
medium / 1080p	110−120	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Fortnite is 443% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	60−65	5−6
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	3−4
4K / 2160p	24−27	2−3
low / 720p	100−110	18−20
medium / 1080p	65−70	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	140−150	45−50
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	4−5
ultra / 1080p	30−35	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	4−5
medium / 1080p	30−35	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	130−140	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	120−130	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Minecraft is 44% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	6−7
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	130−140	10−11
medium / 768p	85−90	8−9
high / 1080p	45−50	4−5
ultra / 1080p	24−27	4−5
4K / 2160p	16−18	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	14−16
high / 768p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 770	NVS 810
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	30 May 2013	4 November 2015
Pipelines	1536	512
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	902 MHz
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1033 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	134 billion/sec	33.06
Floating-point performance	3,333 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	198 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.3 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.0
CUDA cores	1536
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support	4 displays
HDMI	+
HDCP	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
3D Gaming	+
3D Vision	+
3D Vision Live	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	113 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	3.9 Mh/s
Blu Ray 3D	+
Minimum recommended system power	600 Watt
PhysX	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 770 vs NVS 810

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares