GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 770M SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 770M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 770M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 3 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 58% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 770M SLI.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 770M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 770M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 770M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 770M SLI is 237 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 770M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 770M SLI is 1000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 34% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Fortnite is 35% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M SLI in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1920 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 811 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 2540 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI
- GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI
- Tesla C2050 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M