FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 770M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 770M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 770M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 770M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 770M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 770M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 770M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 770M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 770M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 770M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 770M is 186 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 770M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 770M is 14 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Battlefield 5 is 211% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Fortnite is 147% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 770M in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 770M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14E-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 811 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 63.76 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,530 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 55 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |