GeForce GTX 770M vs GRID K520
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 770M will be the best choice, for others GRID K520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 770M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 770M.
- GeForce GTX 770M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 770M.
- GeForce GTX 770M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 770M is 66 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 770M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14E-GS | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 811 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 63.76 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 55 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |