GeForce GTX 770M vs Tesla T4
When choosing between GeForce GTX 770M and Tesla T4, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 770M and Tesla T4.
Tesla T4
GeForce GTX 770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 770M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 770M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 770M has 7% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 770M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 13 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 770M.
- GeForce GTX 770M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 770M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 770M is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 770M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 770M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 770M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | N14E-GS | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 960 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 811 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 63.76 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 55 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |