FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 775M
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 775M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 775M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 775M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 775M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 775M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 775M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 775M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 181 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 775M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1900 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 775M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 775M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 775M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N13E-GTX-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 24 September 2013 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 719 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3540 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |