FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 775M
When comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 775M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 775M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 775M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 775M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 775M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- GeForce GTX 775M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 775M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 775M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 775M is 94 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 775M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 775M is 1614 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Battlefield 5 is 377% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 775M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Dota 2 is 105% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Fortnite is 247% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Grand Theft Auto V is 161% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 350% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N13E-GTX-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 24 September 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 719 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3540 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |