FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 780M
When comparing FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 780M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 780M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 780M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 780M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 780M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 108 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 780M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 780M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 237% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | N14E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 823 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 102.0 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce GTX 880M