FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 780M
When comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 780M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 780M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 186% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 780M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 780M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 780M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 77 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 780M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 780M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 780M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N14E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 823 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 102.0 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 82 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |