FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 780M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 780M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against GeForce GTX 780M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 22% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 780M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 780M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 780M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 198 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 780M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 514 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 355% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 780M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 440% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 217% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 290% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 823 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 102.0 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce GT 650M
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce GTX 880M