FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 780M
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 780M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 780M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 31% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 780M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 780M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 780M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 73 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 780M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 237% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 171% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 207% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 823 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 102.0 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce 930MX
- GeForce GTX 780M vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce GTX 880M