GeForce 830A vs GeForce GTX 780M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 780M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 780M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 830A
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 830A | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 780M has 269% more power consumption, than GeForce 830A.
- GeForce 830A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 780M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 830A.
- GeForce 830A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 780M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 830A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 780M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830A is 259 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 780M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce 830A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 780M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 137% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 237% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 33% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce 830A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 830A | GeForce GTX 780M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | N14E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 22 July 2014 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 823 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 797 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 102.0 |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | + |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |