GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 780M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 780M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 780M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 780M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
122 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 63% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 780M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 780M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 780M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 780M - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 780M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 392 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 780M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 897 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
20−22
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−33
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
30−35
ultra / 1080p
20−22
27−30
QHD / 1440p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
5−6
8−9
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
230−240
medium / 768p
170−180
200−210
ultra / 1080p
95−100
120−130
QHD / 1440p
50−55
90−95
4K / 2160p
30−33
50−55
high / 768p
130−140
170−180
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
95−100
120−130
medium / 1080p
50−55
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
70−75
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
70−75
90−95
high / 1080p
27−30
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
75−80
medium / 768p
30−35
45−50
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 780M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 780M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF100
N14E-GTX
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
30 May 2013
Pipelines
352
1536
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
823 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
102.0
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
2,448 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
352
1536
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Compute performance
30x
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price