GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce MX350
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 780M and GeForce MX350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 780M will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 780M and GeForce MX350 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 780M and GeForce MX350 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M or GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce MX350
Power consumption (TDP)
122 Watt
20 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 780M has 510% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 780M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 780M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 531 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 4500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 31% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
5−6
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
180−190
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−105
QHD / 1440p
90−95
50−55
4K / 2160p
50−55
30−33
high / 768p
170−180
140−150
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
27−30
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
100−110
medium / 1080p
70−75
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
QHD / 1440p
14−16
9−10
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
90−95
75−80
high / 1080p
40−45
30−33
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
30−33
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 29% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce MX350
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Code name
N14E-GTX
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
30 May 2013
20 February 2020
Pipelines
1536
640
Core clock speed
823 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1468 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
102.0
29.98
Floating-point performance
2,448 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2500 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
56.06 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
6.1
CUDA cores
1536
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price