GeForce GTX 780M vs GRID K160Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K160Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K160Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 780M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K160Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 27 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 160% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 685% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 780M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14E-GTX | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |