GeForce GTX 780M vs GRID K520
When comparing GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 78 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 24% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 17% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
GeForce GTX 780M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N14E-GTX | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |