GeForce GTX 780M vs P104 100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 780M and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 780M will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | P104 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M and P104 100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 784 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 7508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 780M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 780M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | P104 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N14E-GTX | GP104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 12 December 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 208.0 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |