GeForce GTX 780M vs P106 090
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 780M and P106 090 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 780M will be the best choice, for others P106 090 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | P106 090 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 780M has 62% more power consumption, than P106 090.
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 531 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 5508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 28% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 9% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 29% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 780M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | P106 090 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N14E-GTX | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 31 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 73.49 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |