GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon E6760
When choosing between GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon E6760, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon E6760.
Radeon E6760
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon E6760 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 780M has 171% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 223 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon E6760. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon E6760 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | N14E-GTX | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 2 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | 52 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |