GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A265
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 98 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 512% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 720% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14E-GTX | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce GTX 880M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics