FirePro W4190M vs GeForce GTX 850A
When comparing FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 850A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 850A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 850A
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 850A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 77 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 850A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 936 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 37.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |