FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 850A
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 850A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 850A.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 850A
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9270 has 255% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 850A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 152 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 37.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |