GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 850A
When choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 850A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 850A.
GeForce GTX 850A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 850A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 352 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 850 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 224 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 902 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |