GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 850A
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 850A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 850A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 850A
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 398 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF104 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 37.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |