GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce GTX 850A
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 850A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 675MX will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 850A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 675MX has 122% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 850A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 302 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 850A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 850A is 1800 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Fortnite is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N13E-GSR | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 960 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 902 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 37.44 |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 63 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 850A vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M