GeForce GTX 765M vs GeForce GTX 850A
When choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 850A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 850A.
GeForce GTX 850A
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 765M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 850A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 52 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 850A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N14-GE | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 902 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | 936 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 37.44 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |