GeForce GTX 850A vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 850A and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 850A
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q has 188% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 850A has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 52 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 850A and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Fortnite is 34% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 3.0 |