GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Graphics 5100
When choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Graphics 5100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Graphics 5100.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 50% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 702 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Minecraft is 3% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GM107 | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |