GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850A will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 7670A
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X