GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 7670A
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce GTX 485M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M