GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GM107 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7670A
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2