GeForce GTX 850A vs Quadro K620M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K620M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K620M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 850A
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K620M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 127 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | GM108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |