GeForce GTX 850A vs Quadro M4000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro M4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 850A stacks up against Quadro M4000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 850A
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 122% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro M4000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 73 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1013 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |