GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850A and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850A will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 2 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 440% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |