GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 850A stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 850A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |