FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 850M
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 850M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 850M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 850M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 850M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 or GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000
GeForce GTX 850M
Power consumption (TDP)
43 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 850M has 4% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 850M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 850M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 850M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
190−200
medium / 768p
120−130
160−170
ultra / 1080p
65−70
85−90
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
90−95
medium / 1080p
30−33
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Fortnite is 33% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
60−65
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
30−35
45−50
medium / 768p
21−24
30−33
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro M6000.
Full Specs
FirePro M6000
GeForce GTX 850M
Architecture
GCN
Maxwell
Code name
Heathrow
N15P-GT
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
12 March 2014
Pipelines
640
640
Core clock speed
750 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
32.00
36.08
Floating-point performance
1,024 gflops
1,155 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
80.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
n/a
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
153 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
DDR3 or GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.8 Mh/s
Form factor
MXM-B
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
