GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 850M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 850M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against GeForce GTX 850M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 255% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 850M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Minecraft is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GF114 | N15P-GT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 36.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 153 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |