GeForce GTX 850M vs Radeon HD 7670A
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon HD 7670A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7670A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 45 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 850M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 850M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce GTX 850M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Dota 2 is 62% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 271% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N15P-GT | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.08 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |