GeForce GTX 850M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 850M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 850M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 428% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- GeForce GTX 850M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- GeForce GTX 850M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | N15P-GT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |