GeForce GTX 850M vs Tesla T4
When comparing GeForce GTX 850M and Tesla T4, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 850M and Tesla T4 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla T4
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 55% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- GeForce GTX 850M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Code name | N15P-GT | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.08 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |