GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 860M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2x 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 16% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 659 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 3900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 860M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 578% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 860M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 513% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−105 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Maxwell |
| Code name | G92 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 2x 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |