GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
120 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2x 4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 186 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 3397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−33
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
9−10
low / 720p
50−55
75−80
medium / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
230−240
medium / 768p
170−180
210−220
ultra / 1080p
95−100
130−140
QHD / 1440p
50−55
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−33
55−60
high / 768p
130−140
170−180
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
60−65
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
95−100
130−140
medium / 1080p
50−55
80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
QHD / 1440p
8−9
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
75−80
medium / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−105
high / 1080p
27−30
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
80−85
medium / 768p
30−35
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
GF100
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
12 March 2014
Pipelines
352
1280
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
1029 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
2x 1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
