GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon Pro 560
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro 560 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro 560 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro 560 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI or Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Radeon Pro 560
Power consumption (TDP)
120 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2x 4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 860M SLI has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
Radeon Pro 560 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 122 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 80 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 27% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
QHD / 1440p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
9−10
6−7
low / 720p
75−80
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro 560 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
220−230
medium / 768p
210−220
190−200
ultra / 1080p
130−140
100−110
QHD / 1440p
100−110
70−75
4K / 2160p
55−60
35−40
high / 768p
170−180
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
QHD / 1440p
21−24
18−20
4K / 2160p
9−10
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−33
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
80−85
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
35−40
30−33
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−12
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
medium / 768p
100−105
85−90
high / 1080p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
80−85
65−70
medium / 768p
50−55
40−45
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
4K / 2160p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 560.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Radeon Pro 560
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
Polaris 21
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 March 2014
5 June 2017
Pipelines
1280
1024
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
2x 1870 Million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
SLI options
+
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
