GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
120 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2x 4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 860M SLI has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 2600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
QHD / 1440p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
high / 1080p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
QHD / 1440p
14−16
18−20
4K / 2160p
9−10
10−11
low / 720p
75−80
75−80
medium / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
240−250
medium / 768p
210−220
210−220
ultra / 1080p
130−140
130−140
QHD / 1440p
100−110
100−110
4K / 2160p
55−60
60−65
high / 768p
170−180
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
85−90
85−90
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
QHD / 1440p
21−24
21−24
4K / 2160p
9−10
9−10
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
high / 1080p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−33
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
80−85
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
75−80
75−80
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−105
100−110
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
4K / 2160p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Maxwell
Vega
Code name
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 March 2014
15 November 2018
Pipelines
1280
1024
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
2x 1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
76.16
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
SLI options
+
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
