GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 98% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 2000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 1870 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |