FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 860M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 860M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 860M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 860M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 82 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 860M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 97% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 187% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | N15P-GX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 43.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |